Supreme Court Ruling on Indecent Language
Tuesday, April 28th, 2009I read today that the Supreme Court upheld the regulation of “indent” language on television (Los Angeles Times, 2009). I applauded this because children and decent adults shouldn’t be subject to foul language while watching primetime television. If producers want to include foul language on cable television shows or pay-per-view shows then that’s there choice. But, the rest of us should be protected and not have to worry about hearing the F-word while watching television.
I find that kind of language offensive and unneeded. What does it add to the show anyway? There are decent enough ways to express anger or excitement. Although I do believe that everyone has the right to speak their mind, there are many other ways to do this without impeding on the rights of others.
The Supreme Court decided that the FCC does have the authority to fine and “crack down” on ‘foul-mouthed glitteratae from Hollywood.’ The “F-word” and “S-word” should not be used during prime-time broadcasts. The new policy states that a “single ‘fleeting expletive’ could trigger fines for the network and all the local broadcasters who aired the show.” Members of the media are considering this an impairment on artistic expression, and looking to appeals based on violations of the 1st Amendment.
I am glad the Supreme Court has made this ruling on decency on prime-time television, and that they value the importance of protecting minors. This is one time when I think the 1st Amendment should be limited, as it has major effects on other citizens. It’s one thing to assemble and protest but another when movie stars are just using unnecessary foul language in everyday shows that minors watch. There is a line to draw.

